Digital technology has caused an explosion of digital photos and video. The world and the web is awash with 1s and 0s representing images of ourselves. In 100 years will the YouTube archives be a valuable historical source? Will video of our daily lives be as valued as the scratchy moving images from 100 years ago?
The childhoods of today will be the most documented ever – digital cameras are ubiquitous in the modern world. As adults, when will they look at this massive family archive?
Digital media can be perfectly copied, but also manipulated and tampered with. Can digital images really be as authentic as film images?
Nanotechnology promises the control of matter at the atomic scale. This allows the creation of exotic new optical materials which exploit quantum effects to control light. Developed primarily for optical circuitry, uses on a macro scale have also been proposed, such as the creation of 'invisibility cloaks'. These would be made of material which bends and channels light around an object, making the object effectively transparent.
I propose another use, which would lead to a new form of 'media' as antidote to digital technology – moving images that once 'recorded' can be viewed only once, at a specific time in the future, but which are totally authentic...
Scroll sideways! >>>
10 years on, and the light from that first captured Christmas has finally passed through the lens. The family can marvel at themselves 10 years ago.
At the same time the scene is being captured again, for 10 years hence.